I have researched some health problems of myself, and other individuals and found that the official medical establishment often does not consider or suggest safe and effective solutions!
We all have health issues and there exists many research experiments, trials, case studies, and anecdotal evidence to suggest certain safe and effective solutions that often address the root cause of a health problem and hence can cure health issues as well as manage their symptoms.
When you see the term "patient" here, remember that you are your doctors patient, not mine, as I am not a doctor and so I cannot give medical advice. I can only help you find and understand the educational material and current research most relevant to your condition so that you are empowered to make your own fully informed decisions on possible treatments and on the competence and limitations of your doctor's suggested treatments.
There is no time limit for this. The patient can take as much time and resources as needed to understand risks and choose to make an informed safe change to their nutrition or lifestyle.
The body fluid flows, immune system, microbiome, signaling molecules and hormones can all be influenced by a large range of environment changes, many of which can be free, re-purposed or non-patented.
Treatments can be added or removed while measuring progress until an optimum for this particular patient is reached. It has been shown by research that doing 20 things concurrently can hugely positively affect outcomes, yet no commercial clinical trial will ever do this as the objective is to approve a patented drug, not cure a patient. How many real wars are won using only one weapon?
Treatments should be non-toxic to healthy cells.
Many diseases (e.g. cancer) have alternative non-conventional explanations of their true nature. These alternatives such as Metabolic Theory and Cell Suppression Theory have much higher probability of being true (hence useful) than the conventional Somatic Theory, but may result in treatments that are inconveniently less profitable for journals, universities, hospitals, drug companies and food companies. Conventional Somatic theory says all cancers are different, your cancer is "rare" or there is no (profitable) treatment in the guidelines.
Many summaries of evidence exclude completely patient results from studies that were small (statistically insignificant in isolation), not placebo controlled, used more than 1 treatment, were not double blinded, or had a risk of bias (e.g. optimism). This means that the amazing life saving results of treatments such as using Calcifidiol for treating severe Covid in Spain were completely ignored by the medical establishment.
The reasons that some solutions are not suggested by doctors is :-
How do we fix these incentive problems for doctors/advisors/educators?