Ask Chris Turner (not a doctor) for help navigating the medical research

Your problems and possible solutions researched and discussed!

I have researched some health problems of myself, and other individuals and found that the official medical establishment often does not consider or suggest safe and effective solutions!

Worse, they actively discourage, ridicule, or severely punish any alternative thinking by an individual. You are forced to accept institution approved solutions prescribed by qualified, trained and institution approved doctors.

We all have health issues and there exists many research experiments, trials, case studies, and anecdotal evidence to suggest certain safe and effective solutions that often address the root cause of a health problem and hence could cure health issues as well as manage their symptoms.

Remember that you are your doctors patient, not mine, and only your doctor is authorised to give advice or treatment. I am not a doctor and so I cannot give medical advice or treatment and I will be jailed and fined if I do so.
Section 4 of the Cancer Act, 1939

I can only help you navigate and understand the educational material and current research most relevant to your condition so that you are empowered to make your own fully informed decisions on possible treatments and on the competence and limitations of your doctor's suggested treatments.

Provide education (not advice or recommendation) to patient such that they can understand bodily processes.

There is no time limit for this. The patient can take as much time and resources as needed to understand risks and choose to make an informed safe change to their nutrition or lifestyle. A doctor does not have time or incentive to do this.

Light, Acceleration, Force, Oxygen, Massage, Exercise, Vibration, Topical Chemicals, Minerals, Sleep, Emotions.

The body fluid flows, immune system, microbiome, signaling molecules and hormones can all be influenced by a large range of environment changes, many of which can be free, re-purposed or non-patented.

Measure and track health markers and subjective patient experience to assess progress.

Nutrition or lifestyle choices can be added or removed while measuring progress until an optimum for an individual is reached. It has been shown by research that doing 20 things concurrently can positively affect outcomes, yet no commercial clinical trial will ever do this as the objective is to approve a patented drug, not cure a patient. How many real wars are won using only one weapon?

Minimize side effects

Nutrition or lifestyle choices should be non-toxic to healthy cells. Only doctors are authorised to poison you.

Explore alternative theories

Many diseases (e.g. cancer) have alternative non-conventional explanations of their true nature. These alternatives such as Metabolic Theory and Cell Suppression Theory have much higher probability of being true (hence useful) than the conventional Somatic Theory, but may result in treatments that are inconveniently less profitable for journals, universities, hospitals, drug companies and food companies. Conventional Somatic theory says all cancers are different, your cancer is "rare" or there is no (profitable) treatment in the guidelines.

Accept all evidence (from doctors), one patient one vote

Many summaries of evidence exclude completely patient results from studies that were small (statistically insignificant in isolation), not placebo controlled, used more than 1 treatment, were not double blinded, or had a risk of bias (e.g. optimism). This means that the amazing life saving results of trials of treatments such as using Calcifidiol for treating severe Covid in Spain were completely ignored by the medical establishment.

But surely we can trust the government and medical establishment to want us healthy?

The reasons that some solutions are not suggested by doctors is :-

  1. Ignorance. The doctor was educated 10 years ago by a course that was updated 20 years ago and nobody has had the time to read new research (except drug company propaganda).
  2. Fear. The doctor will be legally prosecuted unless he follows approved guidelines. If he questions the mainstream practice he will be punished.
  3. Commercial interest. The doctor (or his employer) is paid by the number of patient visits handled per hour or by commission on an expensive treatment. He must therefore pick the quickest option for him or the most expensive treatment.
  4. Perverse incentives. There are flows of money which have a higher priority compared to the true health or cure of a patient. The repeat profits of drug companies are maximized by keeping the patient chronically treated by patented drugs (even non-sick patients designated "at risk"). The quick death of an economically inactive person is cheaper for the state. The design of cheap and addictive food products makes the most repeat profit for food companies. Politicians, state employees and charities can get funding from drug or food companies (if they say the "right" things). The standard medical practice of using toxic chemotherapy which damages your immune system while often not curing the cancer shows how little the establishment knows (or wants to know) of cancer.
  5. Pride. Many experts have spent a lot of time advising. Many may be embarrassed by admitting that previous advice was wrong or that alternative better cancer theories exist!.
  6. Censorship. Many information sources such as google search results, AI agent advice, YouTube videos, user comments on forums are "ordered by relevance", "moderated" or just deleted if they don't match the official narrative. It is nice to know that we are protected from snake oil salesmen selling useless cures to desperate customers using emotional language. Please google "cancer myths" to get the official reliable information from the official reliable organisations. They will be top of the search results. No need to question it as it is very difficult to research yourself. Leave it to the credible approved experts. Always talk to your doctor if considering alternative treatment, supplements, diet, vitamines, minerals and herbs especially if you are taking prescription medication. Those prescription medications can kill you if mixed with something else so you may have to stop them first.

How do we fix these incentive problems for doctors/advisors/educators?

  1. Pay for continued research (to find and refine new solutions even if discovered yesterday).
  2. Accept research of N=1, unblinded, with multiple synergistic elements (perhaps 20 items) with no placebo, as a low cost way to refine a theory of mechanism.
  3. No cure, no fee! The patient is refunded most fees if no cure works.
  4. Death, no fee! The patients family is refunded if death occurs.
  5. Long term cure, bonus reward (after a year).
  6. No markup on treatment/drug costs.
  7. Empower and educate the patient. Patient fully responsible for choosing, understanding and implementing solution (with full information of all solutions!).
  8. Every patient experience, good or bad, must become scientific evidence and be logged and shared (anonymously if desired).
  9. Placebo effect should be maximized, not avoided, and its magnitude explained by theory of mechanism (hormonal?)